Emmeline Pankhurst was an activist in the United Kingdom during the early 1900s. She was a leader of the suffrage movement that helped gain women the right to vote. In 1912, Pankhurst and several other suffragettes tried to burn down the Royal Theater in Dublin, Ireland, after the British prime minister had gone to a performance there. Over the next two years, suffragettes set fire to several buildings in the United Kingdom. Some people felt that Pankhurst's approval of the violence turned the public against the suffrage movement, but ultimately the UK Parliament granted all women the right to vote in 1928. Interpretation 1 — Pankhurst was justified in using violence because it kept the women's rights movement in the public eye. Interpretation 2 — Pankhurst should not have used violence because it turned people away from supporting the women's rights movement. Which statement best compares the two interpretations of Emmeline Pankhurst's actions?

i really really really really really really dont know

c. typhoon

hope this

answer: the purpose of the "index of forbidden books" was to prevent the contamination of the faith or the corruption of morals of roman catholics according to canon law, through the reading of theologically mistaken or immoral books. the condemnation of published books, thus listed in the index librorum prohibitorum.

explanation: index librorum prohibitorum, (latin: “index of forbidden books”), list of books once forbidden by roman catholic church authority as dangerous to the faith or morals of roman catholics. publication of the list ceased in 1966, and it was relegated to the status of a historic document.

the 20th and final edition appeared in 1948, and the index was formally abolished on 14 june 1966 by pope paul vi. the aim of the list was to protect the faith and morals of the faithful by putting a stop to the reading of theologically, culturally, and politically disruptive books.