Following the U. S. Supreme Court's 1954 decision to desegregate schools, the percentage of European-Americans favoring integrated schools more than doubled. This is an example of how

Moral actions feed moral attitudes

Explanation:

The U.S. Supreme Court in 1954 outlawed racial segregation in public schools. The percentage of European American favouring integrated schools was more because they saw segregation as an evil practice which separated African American. The action of favouring more results in good actions that support good attitudes.

Moral actions feed moral attitudes.

Explanation:

In 1954, the Supreme Court of the United States gave a historical verdict of desegregating the schools. The distinguished case of Brown v Board was concluded in the favor of desegregation of schools by the courts of Warren.

The aftermath of this decision was that more people who favored desegregation came forwards and supported it. The percentage doubled of the European Americans who supported the integration of schools.

This exemplifies that moral actions feed moral attitudes. Moral actions by the Supreme Court of the United States fed moral attitudes of others as well.

i believe the answer is:

-   william jennings bryan is a democrat while mckinley was a republican

at that time, the segment of population that choose for democratic party were the voters with low economic background and vice versa

- william jennings has support of populists and wants to have inflation to farmers while mckinley has support of bankers and businessmen , doesn't want inflation

the fixed value of gold make the large business able to stack up their gold without   being worried that it would devaluated.

- william jennings supported the silver standard while mckinley supported the gold standard

according to jenning, using other metal beside gold could the poor people to have more purchasing power and them advance in the society.

here is a link that will you.