Can I get help on this pls due soon ​

1:

The "Anti Mask meeting" part because its dipicting its during the time of Late 2019-2021 were we have a mask ordinace thats according this "Unhealthy"

2:

"Anti mask meeting" by it self because it also is telling you that its meant for people who already wear masks and disagree on it.

3: "to protest against" and "Anti mask meeting" dipict that the purpose is to talk and protest against the mask mandate we have in multiple areas.

4:

The point of view of the creator is that the gathering is to protest against the wrongdoings of the mask madate examplifying the creator agrees with the people meeting and seems to intend to join them. Considering he calls the speakers "interesting" which is an opinon he gladly shared which only people do when they truely feel this way, and based on the way it was said it was a good verison of interesting. There for repersenting that he agrees and likes the idea of the meeting.

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is