Question 1 of 10 When would a secondary source be considered unreliable?

A. When it offers a theory about the significance of an event

B. When it omits information that contradicts its conclusions

C. When it is written by an academic professional

D. When it is written by someone who did not experience an event directly

It is d because you cannot be sure as the person who has written has not been there so you don't know if they are telling the truth or exaggerating the event

they gained control over the philippines, east dutch indies/indonesia, much of new guinea, the solomon islands, guam, and other strategic areas all over the western pacific. japan even occupied part of the aleutian islands, which belonged to alaska.

source:

have a great day