Could something like allowing the people of the state to choose between slave and free state cause problems? Anyone who gets it right gets a brainist!!

Allowing the citizens of each state to choose whether the state should prohibit slavery or not, could cause problems as it violated the country's sense of unity.

Explanation:

The problem of allowing citizens in each state to decide whether slavery should be banned or released in each state could cause many problems. This is because it infirms the sense of unity, causing the states to devalue each other and not see themselves as belonging to the same country. This would also weaken the federal government, which would not be able to establish a single legislation throughout the territory, which could create several political problems, as well as a strong regional prejudice.

b) a state law could be declared illegal if it contradicted the constitution.

explanation:

the conflict of this case originated when james w. mcculloch, a cashier of the baltimore branch of the second bank of the united states that the congress had chartered in 1816, refused to pay a tax imposed by the maryland state.

in the case, the state of maryland appealed that the establishment of a second bank was unconstitutional since the constitution didn't say anything about granting that power to congress. however, the case determined that even if such right wasn't specifically stated in the constitution, it was part of the "implied powers" of the government enunciated in article i, section 8.

the case also eliminated maryland's legislation to impose taxes to a national bank, asserting that even though the states retained the power of taxation, the constitution's laws are supreme and can not be controlled by the states, therefore, if a state law contradicts the constitution, it should be declared illegal.

explanation: