Many observers maintained that the drop in crime in the 1990s was at least in part due to the adoption of innovative policing strategies. Focusing on the experience in New York City, what do the data tell us about the viability of this assertion? Should we then conclude that smart policing is not a good thing? Why or why not? freakonomics - chapter 4

umm i mean it depends on hwat they mean by smart policing becuase if its actually helping the people then good but if its just fighting the people back and killing the colors aint nothing going change itll get worse again.

Explanation:

non explanation

several states had passed similar laws, but they were limited to intrastate businesses. the sherman antitrust act was based on the constitutional power of congress to regulate interstate commerce.

you answered my friends question just to get the coins you didn't even give a valid response.