subject
History, 29.04.2021 20:30 monkeys450

It is...[the]duty of the judicial [branch] to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to particular cases must...interpret that rule... So, if a law [conflicts with] the Constitution,...the Court must either decide that case [in favor of] the law... This is the very essence of judicial duty.

What conclusion did the Court reach to solve the problem identified in the passage?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 14:30
Which of the following was true of american workers during the harding administration? a.) few joined unions because there were no unions to join. b.) many joined unions because of fordism. c.) few joined unions because the economy was strong. d.) many joined unions because of unfair labor laws.
Answers: 3
question
History, 21.06.2019 20:30
In which country did miguel hidalgo led the revolution against spain?
Answers: 2
question
History, 21.06.2019 23:20
In 1073, the fight over who gets to choose bishops was between pope gregory vii and king henry the iv. t or f
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 05:00
Which statement about submarine use in world war i is true? the allies never found a way to counter german submarine warfare. germany’s use of submarines affected the united states’ decision to enter the war. only the germans used submarines in world war i.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
It is...[the]duty of the judicial [branch] to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to parti...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 05.02.2020 03:47
question
Mathematics, 05.02.2020 03:48
question
English, 05.02.2020 03:48
Questions on the website: 13722363