Central Historical Question: To what extent should the federal government be involved in the election process? Construct an argument that addresses the Central Historical Question using knowledge of federalism, election laws, specific claims, and relevant evidence from sources.

In your argument, include the follow:

A claim that argues what level of involvement (unlimited, limited, or no involvement) the federal government should have in election process for the states
What gives or does not give the federal government permission to be involved in in elections
At least 2 historical examples to support your opinion and assertions

don't answer if u don't know, must be in paragraph, i will report you if u put a link.

- "the past is made of multitudinous items ranging from anything that can be collected, recollected or assessed to originate in the past. as such, the past is a gallimaufry of particulars that may not have been related in any way. however, the human mind seeks organization to understand concepts and other things. the human mind therefore seeks relationships in explaining and studying the past. history being a humanity, dictates that historians have to serve this human trait by bringing structure to details of the past. historians do this by creating interpretive frameworks that capture as many details as possible."

< 3

australian plates collided into eurasian plates, and the himalayas formed. the andes mountain range the himalayas and the islands of japan form differently. the andes mountain range formed at the convergent boundary of an oceanic plate and continental plate.