subject
History, 26.04.2021 21:50 annamcveigh50

Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source when analyzing a historical event?
A. To hear about the event from someone who was directly involved
B. To understand how people felt during the period when the event happened
C. To see that event through the eyes of someone who witnessed it
D. To learn from the conclusions of many other experts on the event

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 14:30
Will mark brainliest answers to imperialism and world war i unit test 25 questions connections academy
Answers: 2
question
History, 21.06.2019 15:20
Why did many chinese find communism appealing and it’s early stages
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 01:30
The religious scholar believes that the universe is so complex that it could not be created and directed by a signal god. which of these religions would best reflect the scholars beliefs
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 04:00
What does law number eight of hammurabi’s code describe the punishment for
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source when analyzing a histori...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722367