Do you think it's a good idea for the Supreme Court to have power to declare decisions by the state supreme courts illegal if the Court thinks they are unconstitutional? Or should
this right belong only to the state? Why or why not?

explanation:

there are two statements that are incorrect.

1. the marshall plan was a lend lease program. it was an economic plan that europe redevelop itself after wwii.

2. einstein didn't really do anything to further the allied cause in building the bomb. he merely sent a letter to fdr telling him (in 1939) that if the united states entered the war, perhaps it would be wise to build the bomb before germany did. i would say this answer is incorrect, but when america entered the war 2 years later, fdr thought it might be a good idea to take einstein's advice.

the 4th choice is definitely so wrong that is likely the single answer of this question

they united the colonies in their fight against the british.

d and a is the correct anwsers

explanation: