Compare and contrast the revolutions in India and Indochina . What were their goals ? Which was more successful ?

Hello there! Your answer should be below.

Explanation:

Comparison between Nationalism in India and Indochina (Vietnam):-

India-

1) In India nationalism began to fight against the suppression of British rule. Initially people were unaware of the fact that they were being suppressed indirectly by the Britishers.

2) The stress of being humiliated created a strong bond among the people and they came together to fight for their freedom.

3) The unity was evolved through many struggles and movements conducted by many freedom fighters.

4) Mahatma Gandhi introduced a powerful method of fighting known as 'Satyagraha' means insistence for truth, and it was purely non-violent.

5) India attained freedom in 1947 from the Britishers.

6) India's freedom struggle was purely based on suppression and ill treatment done by the Britishers.

Indochina (Vietnam)-

1) Vietnam was developed purely of colonial context and it was under the shadow of Chinese empire.

2) Vietnam followed the Chinese system of government and Chinese was the language of Vietnam.

3) In 1858, the French set up its colony in Vietnam as they were very rich in natural resources. French had undertaken the development projects so as to establish their control over the country.

5) French language was used as a medium of education to civilize and educate the Vietnamese.

6) Vietnam attained independence in 1945 but it took almost three decades to fight for the status of a republic country.

"the sepoy rebellion was the result of many, many influences and stressors on the cultures of india living under british rule. in britain, it's called the sepoy mutiny on the indian mutiny, but in india, it's called the first war of independence.

the main reason is concerned to the british paramountcy , the belief in british   dominance in india political, economic and cultural life had been introduced in india about 1820."

"they were forced to grow crops that benefited the colonizing nations instead of feeding their own people."