Many argue it would be beneficial to have few elections because
a. so many candidates in one party can be confusing
b. there are too many candidates and referendums to vote on
c. fewer elections would bring a higher voter turnout
d. fewer elections would mean regulating the terms of elected officials to four years

The correct answer is:

C. fewer elections would bring a higher voter turnout

The main benefit is that more people would vote. With the high number of elections few people decide since others are apathetic or don't care about the local elections. If the number of elections decreases people probably will participate more.

the caste system in india is the paradigmatic ethnographic example of caste. it has origins in ancient india, and was transformed by various ruling elites in medieval, early-modern, and modern india, especially the mughal empire and the british raj.it is today the basis of educational and job reservations in india.it consists of two different concepts, varna and jati, which may be regarded as different levels of analysis of this system.

the caste system as it exists today is thought to be the result of developments during the collapse of the mughal era and the british colonial regime in india. the collapse of the mughal era saw the rise of powerful men who associated themselves with kings, priests and ascetics, affirming the regal and martial form of the caste ideal, and it also reshaped many apparently casteless social groups into differentiated caste communities.the british raj furthered this development, making rigid caste organisation a central mechanism of administration

i didn’t fully understand your question but i hope this you !