Which statement best explains how lowell uses the aquarium and the statue of colonel shaw as symbols? neither the aquarium nor the monument are able to stand the test of time because they are man-made symbols, as only natural things can endure. the aquarium that has been destroyed is a symbol for the natural, beautiful things that are destroyed, while shaw's statue is a symbol of the future. both the aquarium and the monument are architectural structures that have been destroyed or almost destroyed, and are symbols for a decent past. the monument to colonel shaw was a symbol for the civil rights movement, and was replaced by the aquarium, which is merely a commercial enterprise.

do but i don't go there

explanation:

btw this is in middle school stuff lol

"the gulf of tonkin resolution in 1967".

the gulf of tonkin resolution (officially called southeast asia resolution, public law 88-408) is a law issued by the congress of the united states of america on august 7, 1964, in which president lyndon b. johnson was authorized1 to act in a comprehensive manner against the democratic republic of vietnam, which he accused of aggressions against us ships in the gulf of tonkin, where the resolution takes its name. the gulf of tonkin resolution is of historical importance because it gave authorization to the us president. lyndon b. johnson, without a formal declaration of war by congress, to use military force in southeast asia.