(02.02 mc)

"in determining questions in the united states in congress assembled, each state shall have one vote."-articles of confederation

could a person correctly argue that this quote violates the principle of popular sovereignty? (1 point)

a person could not correctly argue that it is a violation because the quote shows states did have a voice in government.
one could not correctly argue that it is a violation because the quote shows that each state has equal power in congress.
a person could correctly argue that is a violation because the states would have less power than the leaders in congress.
one could correctly argue that it is a violation because the states have different populations and should have proportional votes.

The correct answer is D) One could correctly argue that it is a violation because the states have different populations and should have proportional votes.

Could a person correctly argue that this quote violates the principle of popular sovereignty? The answer would be: One could correctly argue that it is a violation because the states have different populations and should have proportional votes.

That is why delegates had to reach an agreement during the Constitutional Convention of 1787, about proportional representation in Congress. The agreement was called the Great Compromise. Roger Sherman, a delegate from Connecticut was the one who proposed this agreement that included the creation of two legislative bodies that ended up being the Senate and the House of Representatives.

yes based on alexanders actions he deserved the title of "the great". his empire covered about 3,000 miles and he was able to establish the empire over a 13 year period of time. he was able to conquer many different places. he also defeated the persians. he conquered egypt and developed a city and named it after himself.