Suppose you have read two different books on world war ll, and each book has different arguments about how the war started. which of the following best describes the stronger historical argument? a. the argument that was written most recently b. the argument with the most reliable cited sources c. the argument that has the most sources d. the argument that does not use any electronic sources.

B. The argument with the most reliable cited sources

Explanation:

The argument with the most reliable sources would be the one that you must trust the most, since different books can defend and propose different arguments you should trust the one that has the most reliable cited sources in order to find the one that is more precise and objective.

the committees of correspondence were the american colonies’ means for maintaining communication lines in the years before the revolutionary war. in 1764, boston formed the earliest committee of correspondence to encourage opposition to britain’s stiffening of customs enforcement and prohibition of american paper money. the following year, new york formed a similar committee to keep the other colonies notified of its actions in resisting the stamp act. in 1773, the virginia house of burgesses proposed that each colonial legislature appoint a committee for intercolonial correspondence. the exchanges that followed built solidarity during the turbulent times and bring about the formation of the first continental congress in 1774.