subject
History, 13.12.2019 04:31 hermesrobles

In schmerber v. california, the court said that a search warrant was not necessary because
a. the suspect’s blood was drawn in a safe way
b. the rights of the individual take precedence over public safety
c. the officer did not have time to secure a warrant
d. the suspect’s privacy rights cannot be violated

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 19:30
In which two days did the spread of enlightenment thought contribute to the french revolution
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 02:10
Why is the supreme court decision in roe v. wade so controversial.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:30
Ineed a example for this test plz reflect on your decisions in the cases of hazelwood v. kuhlmeier and t.m. v. state of florida using the following questions: did your opinion reflect the majority or minority opinion on each case? did you tend to favor loose or strict interpretation of the laws and rights for each case? what factors most influenced your decision and interpretations in each cas
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 08:00
How many people died in battle during world war 1? a. 8-9 mill b. 3-4 mill c. 1 mill d. more than 10 mill
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
In schmerber v. california, the court said that a search warrant was not necessary because
a....
Questions
question
Mathematics, 29.11.2020 17:40
question
Social Studies, 29.11.2020 17:40
question
Mathematics, 29.11.2020 17:40
question
Mathematics, 29.11.2020 17:40
Questions on the website: 13722362