Saladin agreed to confirm an ironclad peace agreement between christians and saracens [muslims]. it guaranteed free passage and access to the holy sepulcher of the lord, without the requirement of any tribute or fee. it also granted the freedom of bringing objects for sale through any land whatever and of exercising a free commerce.

The correct answer is D) freedom of trade between Europeans and Muslims.

The condition of the peace treaty was freedom of trade between Europeans and Muslims.

We are referring to the Treaty of Ramla. It was signed in 1192 by Richard the Lion Heart and Saladin. The treaty ended the hostilities of the Battle of Arsuf. One of the terms was that Muslims would still control Jerusalem but they would allow Christians to visit the city for pilgrimages.

The other options of the question were A) increased land sales to Christians, B) increased tributes paid to Saladin and the Muslims and C) Christian occupation of Jerusalem.

mickey : )

explanation:

why not?

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is