Which of the following best explains the outcome and significance of the case described?

a: in miranda v. arizona the supreme court ruled that it is the attorney's duty to inform suspects of their rights.

b: in miranda v. arizona, the supreme court decided that it is the citizens' responsibility to be aware of their own rights.

c: in gideon v. wainwright, the supreme court decided that every person who was convicted at trial and did not have an attorney deserves a new trial.

d: in gideon v. wainwright, the supreme court ruled that every state must provide an attorney when the defendant cannot afford one.

wouldn't it be B? the Miranda warning is advising them of their right to silence in order to not violate the 5th amendment self incrimination thing

i believe he was the 5th king of uruk. so c

the correct answer is a) he thought the government’s military action was a mistake.

the whiskey rebellion was a tax protest in the us that started in 1791 and ended in 1974. it has this name because the whiskey tax was the first tax that was imposed on a domestic product by the new federal government.

jefferson was against the government’s military action because he believed that the purpose of the government was to protect the unalienable rights of its citizens and that these rights include life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness and he thought that people had the constitutional right to rebel. he has said: “the first error was to pass it (the whiskey tax); the second was to enforce it; and the third, to make it the means of splitting this union.”

i really hope this answer you out! it makes my day people like you and giving back to the community that has me through school! if you could do me a favor, if this you and this is the very best answer and you understand that all of my answers are legit and top notch. mark as brainliest! and have a awesome day!