Is the "just peace" or the "peace of vengeance" a better policy? why?

Just peace is a better policy.

Explanation:

Just peace was a policy that sought to avoid conflict by assuming that all people of all nations were equal and had the same rights. On the other hand, the Peace of Revenge was a policy that preached that the lands of the conquered countries had to be linked to the colonial lands to generate more power and control to the colonizers.

Depending on your point of view, you may think that peace of vengeance is a better policy, but it is always better to establish equal among all and avoid unnecessary conflicts.

explanation:

cause they can

due to inefficiency of management, the business plan has failed

idk what right product means but i assume it's this one since this was the last one left after i did the other three

the finance team has misjudged the requirement of business plan and chosen a wrong line of credit

operations risk is when the employees make a mistake

flash floods have damaged all machinery in the main manufacturing

natural disasters include anything ruined in the business by the weather or other disasters such as earthquakes

there have been foreign exchange rate fluctuations

economic risks is when things in the economy changes (like interest rates, currency value). the government has a large part in controlling this