From an associated press article on venezuela dated january 22, 2008: " troops are cracking down on the smuggling of food the national guard has seized about 750 tons of food [president] hugo chàvez ordered the military to keep people from smuggling scarce items like milk he's also threatened to seize farms and milk plants " these actions were the result of a price ceiling on food. which zone (represented by a letter) on the graph reflects this policy, and what does it create?

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

What this policy reflects is "demand exceeds supply," and what it creates is that "it results in a shortage."

That was the case with Venezuela on January 22, 2008. Furthermore, the crisis accentuated because of some economic and political decisions made by President Chávez, that always supported socialism. These ideas confronted him with private companies in Venezuela and with other countries such as the United States that saw in Chávez a real threat to its economic interests in the region. Even today, with President Nicolás Maduro, Venezuela still has terrible economic crises and the US has decided to exert an economic embargo on Venezuela.

new york- english

new orleans- french

new hampshire- english

new mexico- spanish

new jersey- english

new bern- sweedish

new rochelle- french

these r just a few i thought of

it was certainly a debatable decision, mainly because it was based primarily on political - and not on legal or social - views. since the congress at that time was led by members of the republican party, and the territory that the tribes wanted to turn into an exclusively indian state was predominantly democratic, the proposal (as expressed in the constitution) did not succeed, but the constitution itself proved to be of crucial importance in the creation of the state of oklahoma, and, most importantly, it guaranteed the involvement of representatives of the indian tribes in the government of the future joint state.  

as a member of congress, i would have voted to ratify the constitution, or at least to have it tabled. ignoring it was an interested and partial decision.