How did the toleration act of 1649 show that religious attitudes in the middle colonies were different from the attitudes in new england?
a. the law showed that the middle colonies would not tolerate the puritan beliefs that were common in new england.
b. the law showed that the middle colonies wanted to follow european attitudes, not those of new england.
c. the law showed that the middle colonies were more tolerant of different religions than the puritans of new england.
d. the law showed that the middle colonies would not follow laws that forced them to be tolerant, unlike the new england colonies.

C. The law showed that the middle colonies were more tolerant of different religions than the Puritans of New England.

Explanation:

The Act permitted opportunity of worship for all Trinitarian Christians in Maryland, yet condemned to death any individual who prevented the holiness from claiming Jesus.

It was repudiated in 1654 by William Claiborne, a Virginian who had been named as a chief by Oliver Cromwell; he was an Anglican, a Puritan sympathizer, and emphatically antagonistic to the Catholic Religion.

At the point when the Calverts recovered control of Maryland, the Act was reestablished, before being revoked forever in 1692 after the occasions of the Glorious Revolution, and the Protestant Revolution in Maryland.

As the main law on religious resistance in the British North America, it impacted related laws in different settlements and parts of it were resounded in the composition of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, which revered religious opportunity in American law.

do u have any answer choices man?