subject
History, 30.01.2020 13:03 cpcoolestkid4

History/english

read the following:

the consequences of a speedy removal will be important to the united states, to individual states, and to the indians themselves. the pecuniary [financial] advantages which it promises to the government are the least of its recommendations. it puts an end to all possible danger of collision between the authorities of the general and state governments on account of the indians.

how does jackson most clearly make a hasty generalization about indian removal in this excerpt?
a. he has no proof that the american indians and the government will have conflicts.
b. he has no evidence that conflict with american indians will end with their removal.
c. he has no confirmation that the states want the american indians to settle elsewhere.
d. he has no way of knowing whether the american indians want to move from their lands.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 20.06.2019 18:02
Many plains nations depended upon which animal for their survival?
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 21:00
Government powers not provided to the national government in the us constitution but are rather given to the states by the 10th amendment is called?
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 23:30
What role and side did italy fight on during world war 1? why did they change sides? write this in your own words.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 00:00
Which of the following best describe deflation
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
History/english

read the following:

the consequences of a speedy removal w...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722363