Which of the following best illustrates the process of the supreme court’s review of a case?
a. a writ of certiorari is granted > > lawyers on both sides prepare briefs and present oral arguments > > justices hold a conference to form a majority vote > > opinions are written
b. lawyers on both sides prepare briefs and present oral arguments > > a writ of certiorari is granted > > justices hold a conference to form a majority vote > > opinions are written
c. opinions are written > > a writ of certiorari is granted > > lawyers on both sides prepare briefs and present oral arguments > > justices hold a conference to form a majority vote
d. a writ of certiorari is granted > > lawyers on both sides prepare briefs and present oral arguments > > opinions are written > > justices hold a conference to form a majority vote

The correct answer is A) a writ of certiorari is granted >> lawyers on both sides prepare briefs and present oral arguments >> justices hold a conference to form a majority vote >> opinions are written.

The answer that best illustrates the process of the Supreme Court’s review of a case is: " a writ of certiorari is granted >> lawyers on both sides prepare briefs and present oral arguments >> justices hold a conference to form a majority vote >> opinions are written."

After the decision of a lower court left dissatisfaction of some of the parties involved, they can ask for a petition to the United States Supreme Court to review the case. The first step indeed is to ask the Court to grant a Writ of Certiorari, for the lower court to send the record of the case to the Supreme Court. Most of the cases can be heard by the Supreme Court, just the ones that had national implications of significance. Of the 6,000 to 7,000 cases that get to the Court on an annual basis, the US can review only 100 to 150.

2b2t

explanation:

2b2t