How did the monarchies of england and france affect their societies differently?
absolute monarchy in france led to continued acceptance of serfdom, while in england serfdom disappeared.
constitutional monarchy in england led to representative government without a revolution, while france required a revolution.
absolutism in france delayed the intellectual enlightenment, while england's constitutional monarchy fostered the enlightenment.
england's constitutional monarchy efficiently corrected the ills of poverty, while in france the monarchy ignored the poor.

What is the acronym to remember when evaluating source information?

As a result of the germanic tribes sacking rome

Read the excerpt from “pakistan’s malala.” "ziauddin had a revolutionary zeal and deep commitment to education," ellick said this week. "this charming little girl, she is a mini-version of him in many ways. she loves school, homework. whenever she would meet me she had a bookbag full of books." "she didn't have that idealistic activist attitude when she's 10 and 11, because who does? " ellick said. "her situation demanded that she grow up before she should have. she caught his contagious commitment and idealism." which detail best reflects how living in the taliban-ruled swat valley affected malala?