Contextualization The authors observe as they evaluate the significance
of the Emancipation Proclamation, "With a fateful
stroke of the president's pen, the Civil War now
became more of a moral crusade as well as what
Lincoln called a ‘remorseless revolutionary struggle.'
In other words, a war that began to preserve the
Union in 1861 became a war to preserve the Union
and end slavery in January 1863. As you read this
chapter and recall information from Chapter 20, can
you explain how the national context changed from
April 1861 to January 1863? How does this change
in national context help explain Lincoln's decision
to issue the Emancipation Proclamation?

- "the past is made of multitudinous items ranging from anything that can be collected, recollected or assessed to originate in the past. as such, the past is a gallimaufry of particulars that may not have been related in any way. however, the human mind seeks organization to understand concepts and other things. the human mind therefore seeks relationships in explaining and studying the past. history being a humanity, dictates that historians have to serve this human trait by bringing structure to details of the past. historians do this by creating interpretive frameworks that capture as many details as possible."

< 3

yes i can of course like what is it gonna be about

north atlantic treaty organization.

the hebrew bible is the sacred text of judaism;

the koran is that of islam.

among eastern religions, the sacred scriptures of hinduis are the four vedas and the upanishads, among others.

a main characteristic in these books is that un most of them we find certain "norms" of behavior, as is the case of the bible that has it's commandments. these rules are to regulate the behavior of believers and faithful of their respective faith.

these rules tell us what is right and what is not.