Which of the following BEST defines the term economic growth? A.
an increase in available land resources
B.
a company that invests in additional physical capital
C.
an increase in an economy’s ability to produce goods and services
D.
an increase in the value of the goods produced within the economy

Please select the best answer from the choices provided

A
B
C
D

Explain two reasons for socialism and two reasons against social

How many citizens of mexico does it take to equal the ecological footprint of the average citizen of the united states? it takes nearly three mexican citizens to equal the ecological footprint of the average u.s. citizen. it takes about 12 mexican citizens to equal the ecological footprint of the average u.s. citizen. it takes just over eight mexican citizens to equal the ecological footprint of the average u.s. citizen. two citizens of mexico equal the ecological footprint of one average citizen of the united states. they are essentially equal?

In the decision for dred scott vs.sanford, (1857) in which a slave petitioned for his freedom in a st. louis court, on the grounds that his owner had taken him into free territory, and thus he ought no longer be regarded as possessing "slave" status, but should be regarded as a free man, the court decided as follows (excerpt): "in the circuit courts of the united states, the record must show that the case is one in which by the constitution and laws of the united states, the court had jurisdiction--and if this does not appear, and the court gives judgment either for plaintiff or defendant, it is error, and the judgment must be reversed by this court--and the parties cannot by consent waive the objection to the jurisdiction of the circuit court. a free negro of the african race, whose ancestors were brought to this country and sold as slaves, is not a 'citizen' within the meaning of the constitution of the united states. when the constitution was adopted, they were not regarded in any of the states as members of the community which constituted the state, and were not numbered among its 'people or citizen.' consequently, the special rights and immunities guarantied to citizens do not apply to them. and not being "citizens" within the meaning of the constitution, they are not entitled to sue in that character in a court of the united states, and the circuit court has not jurisdiction in such a suit. the only two clauses in the constitution which point to this race, treat them as persons whom it was morally lawful to deal in as articles of property and to hold as slaves. since the adoption of the constitution of the united states, no state can by any subsequent law make a foreigner or any other description of persons citizens of the united states, nor entitle them to the rights and privileges secured to citizens by that instrument." why does the court say that the petitioning party in this case had no right to sue for his freedom? a) because he is too young b) because he is from a different state c) because he is "of the african race" with enslaved ancestors d) because he is, properly speaking, within his owner's jurisdiction