subject
History, 16.04.2021 21:00 stefan19367

What resulted from the Supreme Court's ruling in Miranda v. Arizona (1966)? Evidence obtained in an unconstitutional manner could not be used in court.
Prosecutors could no longer engage in plea bargaining with defense attorneys.
People who were being arrested had to be informed of their Constitutional rights.
Criminal defendants who could not afford an attorney had to be provided with one for free.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 19:10
Choose all that apply. what two things did the wealthy merchants of ancient egypt want?
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 23:00
Which statement describes an important outcome of the congress of vienna? a. napoleon launched his final european military campaigns. b. european states had their borders clearly defined. c. jewish people were given equal right in germanic states d. the slave trade became increasingly important to european economies.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 01:00
What were the short-term and long-term impacts of the american revolution
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 03:00
How influential do you think athenian democracy was on our representative democracy in the united states?
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
What resulted from the Supreme Court's ruling in Miranda v. Arizona (1966)? Evidence obtained in an...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 06.05.2020 07:00
Questions on the website: 13722367