Why was feroz shah tughlaq better ruler than Muhammad tughlaq?​

Because Feroz shah tughlaq built and developed various infrastructure in the Kingdom

Explanation:

Feroz shah talaq was the successor in ruling the Kingdom of Tauglaq after the death of Muhammad talaq.

He was considered a good ruler and built many infrastructures in the kingdom. Some of which includes schools, hospitals, river canals, reservoir, etc.

He also created some institutions such as social welfare for the masses and many more.

On the other hand, MBT failed in many of its dealings. He was unable to build many lasting infrastructures during his reign.

the group i'm selecting: greeks.

a first group of greek immigrants came to the us in the 1850s. the second group came to america starting in the 1890s due to economic opportunities they didn't have back in their home caused by the hardships of ottoman rule. greek immigration was 90% male, many of them expected to work and return to greece after earning enough capital, but ultimately had to remain in the us after the greek genocide.

well let's see i know a little about the fall of the roman empore but what to say i do not have a clue of what to say. (that's 28 words) i learned about it in social studies it was quite boring really my teacher talks a lot, like a lot then gives us a bunch of work sheets not too many though.( that's 60 words)i actually almost fell asleep in class of course i really like that teacher of course she is really nice. i actually don't remember much from that class i got a b without any notes (it was an open notes test)(that's 95 words) i'm wasting time but i've gone too far to stop now i'm sorry i haven't said really any thing on the topic at all sorry not sorry haha jk.(that's 125 words ) (mike drop)