History, 07.04.2021 06:20 rcfarlo9342

What was it that the radical republicans were really worried about following the Civil War?

Answers: 1

Show answers

Another question on History

History, 21.06.2019 18:00

The congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common defence and general welfare of the united states . .; to borrow money on the credit of the united states; to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the indian tribes. —constitution of the united states, article i, section 8 which of these are expressed powers granted by this part of article i, section 8? check all that apply. lay and collect taxes and duties pay debts regulate american indian groups regulate commerce within states borrow money regulate commerce with foreign nations

Answers: 3

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 01:30

Will give brainliest and a will put up a free point questionthe following question refers to a hypothetical situation. the 2010 supreme court case, wagner v. tritch, involves the illegal distribution of copyrighted material to foreign consumers via the internet, which is a new area of law. the 9-0, unanimous vote on the court is set to overturn the lower appellate court decision that augustus tritch was liable for millions of dollars to the plaintiff, frederick von wagner, for illegally distributing his book to overseas customers. now that the court has voted on the case, explain what must happen next? describe the different types of opinions that could come from the court.

Answers: 2

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 09:00

Identify and explain one piece of evidence to show how the european nearest some contributed to the role of europeans in the indian ocean trade

Answers: 2

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 11:30

The government gives public funds to low-performing schools for new computers. they decide to give more money to the lowest performers, some of which happen to promote multi denominational religions. according to the establishment clause, how would a court rule on this case? as a direct violation of the clause because government institutions cannot support religious institutions for any reason as a violation of the clause because the government gave more money to religious schools than public schools as in compliance with the clause because the government's action was for a secular purpose, did not advance a particular religion, and was unentangled as in compliance with the clause because the government gave money to fewer religious schools than public schools