What was the Supreme Court’s decision in the Dred Scott case? A. A slave who moved to a free state is considered a citizen.
B. A slave who moved to a free state is not a citizen.
C. A slave had the right to sue in U. S. courts.
D. Slave owners could not transport slaves beyond state lines.

Sandford, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on March 6, 1857, ruled (7–2) that a slave (Dred Scott) who had resided in a free state and territory (where slavery was prohibited) was not thereby entitled to his freedom; that African Americans were not and could never be citizens of the United States;

A Missouri slave sued for his freedom, claiming that his four year stay in the northern portion of the Louisiana Territory made free land by the Missouri Compromise had made him a free man. The U.S, Supreme Court decided he couldn't sue in federal court because he was property, not a citizen.

Explanation: im pretty sure its A.

the intolerable acts were punitive laws passed by the british parliament in 1774 after the boston tea party. in great britain, these laws were referred to as the coercive acts.