For the mod mastercookie55. a kid was making fun of people who have died like many different people who have passed away and there forth i said to the kid that its idiotic to do and you shouldn't make fun of that now what happened is that i have a warning a my account now for just standing up for so we can stop now ive checked his profile and nothing has been done to him there forth i got a warning on my account for ''cyber bullying'' while the other kid who was making fun of many people have have died. now im getting on the risk of a ban so if any mod sees this i got screen shots of what happened i got info on the kids profile so he can get banned. ill also take the warning on my account for saying the word ''idiotic''.
Edit:if any mods see this message me because i got the screen shots for proof

Mod note:
If you wouldn't want your teachers to see it, don't post it! has a zero-tolerance policy for cyberbullying. If you continue to break this golden rule, your account will be deleted. Please review our Community Guidelines to keep safe and stay out of trouble:

explanation: d

a social contract.

"a social contract is an agreement between citizens and their leader where the citizens give up certain freedoms in exchange for protection. the constitution of the united states is an example of a social contract."

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is