How were the Ottoman and German empires treated similarly by the Allied powers at the end of WWI? How were they treated differently? What were some of the effects of how the Allies treated each former empire?

The Ottoman and German Empires were treated simmilarlyby the allied powers due to the desire to carve them up. The Ottoman empire was partitioned along the sykes-picot line, and later the treaty of Sevres, which ultimately failed. This was because the Ottoman empire had lots of natural resources and easily exploitable populouses. Additionally, Holding Iraq as a mandate for the UK would've allowed them to connect their empire together. (Discluding the Suez)

Germany was viewed as the aggressor of the war, and was subject to be divided. The French ambassador to the Versasilles Conference Clemenceau, wished for Germany to be divided into Bavaria, and the Rhine, with the saarland going to france.

Explanation:

it was certainly a debatable decision, mainly because it was based primarily on political - and not on legal or social - views. since the congress at that time was led by members of the republican party, and the territory that the tribes wanted to turn into an exclusively indian state was predominantly democratic, the proposal (as expressed in the constitution) did not succeed, but the constitution itself proved to be of crucial importance in the creation of the state of oklahoma, and, most importantly, it guaranteed the involvement of representatives of the indian tribes in the government of the future joint state.  

as a member of congress, i would have voted to ratify the constitution, or at least to have it tabled. ignoring it was an interested and partial decision.