subject
History, 27.03.2021 06:00 kimjooin02

In McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, the US Supreme Court found limits on aggregate individual contributions (i. e., aggregate limits on political giving by an individual) to be unconstitutional. However, the court left intact the limits an individual can make to an individual campaign. Why did the court do this?

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 22.06.2019 03:00
Why was the pension issue relevant to the politics of cleveland's presidency?
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 07:10
Yes the notes gathered in your research to answer the following questions
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 09:00
The telegraph, the transatlantic telegraph cable, and the telephone were important to businesses after 1850 because of a. they created a system for developing new inventions. b. they filled a need that other inventions of the day could not. c. they attracted investors and created the stock market. d. they made picture-taking a popular american pastime.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 10:30
What rights are guaranteed in the 13th,14th, and 15th amendments. why was it necessary to change the constitution to guarantee these rights?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
In McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, the US Supreme Court found limits on aggregate individ...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722363