Article: why Fahrenheit 451 will always be terrifying. Question: which statement would be MOST important to include in an accurate and objective summary of the article?

A - Ray Bradburys “Fahrenheit 451” is a classic dystopian novel that deserves to be made into a movie

B - Ray Bradbury was furious when his publisher was forced to censor parts of “Fahrenheit 451”

C - “Fahrenheit 451” is about society that has outlawed books and has firemen destroy any that are found.

D - A school version of “Fahrenheit 451” made it easier for students to fully comprehend the novel.

during the debate over his landmark energy policy proposal, president jimmy carter failed to consult one of the most powerful senators, louisiana’s russell long, who would have a big say over whether the legislation moved through the upper chamber. this was classic carter. with a strong distaste for congressional politics, the president simply refused to do what most other presidents would consider routine, such as courting key senators. long became so irate with the president that when he was finally invited to a white house dinner, he stood up to ask a question and, before doing so, proceeded to sarcastically introduce himself: “i’m russell long, chairman of the senate finance committee.”

this interaction is a revealing moment in stuart e. eizenstat’s fascinating new history of carter’s presidency. the former peanut farmer from georgia was a president who, according to conventional wisdom, didn’t care much for party politics; nonetheless, in eizenstat’s view, carter’s legacy on domestic and foreign policy has been vastly underappreciated. the author paints carter as a “bold and determined” leader who bravely attacked the challenges of his time. eizenstat goes so far as to argue that carter might very well be the most successful one-term president in american history.