How did Manifest Destiny impact U. S. relations with Mexico? 2.2 Group of answer choices

a. The two nations became allies to fight European imperialism.

b. The two nations fought a war over territory in the Southwest.

c. The two nations avoided war after Mexico invaded Texas.

d. The two nations worked together to build a transcontinental railroad.

The two nations fought a war over territory in the Southwest.

The manifest destiny was the belief that the people of the United States had the God-given right to expand their territory to the west. However, this often led to conflict, like it did with Mexico.

Let me know if this helps!

B

Explanation:

Manifest Destiny was the dream that America should control North America from the Atlantic Ocean to the Pacific Ocean. Mexico had legal claim to Texas and owned California , Arizona, and New Mexico. ... The disagreements between the United States and Mexico over the border of Texas led to the Mexican American War. Manifest Destiny played a huge role in American foreign policy. It led to treaty negotiations with Britain over the ownership of the Oregon Territory. Manifest Destiny also led the United States to invade Mexico and then seize much of the West after the successful Mexican War.

even if someone does vote because of your twitter status, there is no civic duty and would have been a more responsible citizen by not voting at all. voting should therefore not be viewed as a fulfillment of civic duty.

hope this : )

isolationism is a doctrine practiced by the united states for much of its history with the aim of not intervening in external affairs that did not pose a real threat to their country. the united states managed to maintain a state of political isolation throughout the nineteenth century and the first part of the xx. few nations have been able to maintain such a position for such a long period of time. historians argue that it is largely due to geographical reasons, given the physical distance between europe and the usa. uu the venataja of this situation is that the national state can spend its resources in satisfying all the needs of its inhabitants, without the need to invest in armament and equipment for a war that does not directly affect the country.

internationalism is a political and cultural movement that advocates for greater political and economic cooperation among nations for mutual benefit. this novimiento was transformed over time, today it includes military intervention in international conflicts with the objective of maintaining peace. the advantage of this move is in the international contacts and the influence developed by the country that carries it forward.

between the two modes of relations between states, i prefer the first, since i believe it is of the utmost importance to satisfy the needs of citizens and work for their development and as a last option to act on the international level.