What would be one colonial advantage to referring to this event as “the bloody massacre? (in other words, how could this incident benefit the colonists by referring to it as a bloody massacre? )
a. in order to gain support for the british king
b. in order to give the colonists a common cause against britain, and separate from it
c. in order to blame colonists for the event
d. in order to make bostonians seem weak

just need the points

explanation:

both are true, the congress does have the power to create banks, even if this power is not specifically described in the constitution, since there is nothing restricting it and there is power given to the congress to make "all laws which shall be necessary and proper". maryland was not allowed to tax a branch of the national bank operating there, and the supreme court decided that no state could. both of these topics were discussed in a decision of the mcculloch v. maryland case in 1819.