WILL MARK BRAINLIEST IF ANSWER IS ORIGINAL In this lesson, you saw the vast differences in how World War II ended in the European and Pacific Theaters. Use this knowledge to explain the decision to use atomic bombs on Japan. For this assignment you will write three well-developed paragraphs on the following: What were the reasons the bomb should have been used on Japan?
What were the reasons the bomb should not have been used on Japan?
Should the atomic bomb have been used on Japan? Why or why not? Support your claim with evidence from the lesson.

The reason why the bomb should have been used on Japan was so that the US could force Japan to surrender. It was also a show of strength to the USSR (Soviet Union).

The bomb should not have been used on Japan because of the massive descruction it made.

In my opinion, I feel like it should not have been used because the US could have used the bombs in less harmful areas so that they would still show their power, but resulting in fewer civilian lives lost. They could have dropped it around Japan or give evidence of this weapon.

Explanation:

Look up :)

payments were made after the 1940s.

in the 1980s, a commission held investigations and made recommendations.