10. What was the main argument used by Anti-Federalists in debates over ratification of the U. S. Constitution? A. Individual rights would be threatened by the creation of a stronger federal government.

B. Separating the powers of the federal government into three branches would lead to confusion and chaos.

C. The state governments would still exercise too much power over the national government

under the new Constitution.

D. It was unclear whether the Supreme Court or the individual states had the power to

declare federal laws unconstitutional

A. Individual rights would be threatened by the creation of a stronger federal government.

Explanation:

The main argument used by Anti-Federalists in debates over ratification of the U.S. Constitution is that "Individual rights would be threatened by the creation of a stronger federal government."

This is evident as they eventually asked for the establishment of a Bill of Rights to serves as a means of protecting the Individual and states rights that may be threatened by the creation of a stronger federal government.

the first forms of writing came from them in the form of pictographs around 3100 bc.

d) a week

because the land run of 1889, although not without precedent in the history of the west, further, their men were aboard the first trains, ready to jump off and begin staking their claims. oklahoma city, edmond, and guthrie were all so affected.