subject
History, 23.02.2021 01:00 gabegabemm1

Some people believe that the post-war trials were just a performance but that there wasn’t any real justice meted out at Nuremburg or elsewhere. Particularly, many people charge that the German post-war trials were too lenient on accused Nazis. Do you think the trials should have been handled differently? What could have been a better option for prosecuting war criminals? Do you think that all Nazi soldiers simply by virtue of being members of the army of the Third Reich, should have been prosecuted for war crimes? What else could have been done to punish the guilty? What should the international community do to make sure such events don’t happen again?

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 19:20
Why did the us government remove native americans from the southeast in the 1830s
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 02:30
Was president roosevelt justified in ordering executive order 9066, which resulted in the internment of japanese american citizens? write a clear claim that responds to this writing prompt.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 04:00
The battle of sabine pass is important because? a) it was a stalemate between union and confederate armies. b) it resulted in the largest confederate casualty in the war. c) it marks the failed attempt of the union army to invade the confederate state of texas. d) it was won by the union soldiers and marked a turning point in the western front of the war.
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 04:30
Discuss the rise and fall of westernization in japan.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Some people believe that the post-war trials were just a performance but that there wasn’t any real...
Questions
question
Business, 30.12.2019 00:31
Questions on the website: 13722363