The map below shows results of the 2010 Gubernatorial Election between Rick Scott (R) and Alex Sink (D). Which of the following statements can you prove to be true using the map and table? The graphic shows the results of the 2010 Florida Gubernatorial Election. Key, Democrat: Blue, Republican: Red. The following cities are listed: Tallahassee (Democrat), Jacksonville (Republican), Orlando (Democrat), Tampa (Democrat), West Palm Beach (Democrat), Miami (Democrat). Northwest and Northeast Florida and some of central and Southwest Florida show republican wins. The area of Southeast Florida (near Miami and West Palm Beach) show Democratic wins.
© 2011 Map Resources

Democratic voters were mainly concentrated in a few areas while Republican voters were scattered around the state.
Some areas had nearly equal numbers of votes for the candidates running for governor.
Democratic and Republican candidates campaigned heavily throughout the state of Florida.
Many more voters turned out in big cities than in all other areas of the state combined.

after the civil war, and with the termination of slavery, the south was faced with a big problem; what was supposed to happen and how they were supposed to deal with the freedom and the rights that black people and freed slaves had gained as a result of the north defeating the south and forcing the end of slavery. first, most, if not all, of the workforce of the south came from slaves and they did not have an option to replace the loss of said workforce. second, particularly in the south, people were convinced that black people were lesser, less intelligent, less capable and less smart than whites. this posed a huge problem for them. also, southerners were faced with another issue; freed slaves now had a say in how their lives would be lived and the right to politically choose the way they would be governed. people in the south did not want to accept this, none of this and this opposition and the conflicts that arose from it, not to mention the afereffects of the war, forced the congress of the time to enact and enforce the reconstruction plans that had been proposed by president andrew johnson.

since most of current immigration into the u.s., both legal and illegal, is coming from latin america. it would be very difficult to imagine or rationalize a country my fellow citizens are trying desperately to flee into, would pose a threat to my prosperity or freedom. since the u.s. has a long history of intervention, but no record of permanent occupation, i would not feel oppression is the main objective.  

the largest free trade nation, along with the largest gdp in the world wanting to expand it's economic policy on us, and including us, could only be positive. the u.s. government has no interest in, or way of simply forcing american culture on us. and has no track record of it. other nations that adopted american social culture, or "americanization" did so voluntarily, mainly through the choice of allowing american businesses and u.s. citizens to come into their nations, as free operatives.

whats the question? im not quite understanding your question.

because the vietnam war was fought in an especially brutal and untraditional way