Herodotus is considered the father of history for all of the following reasons, except:
a. he championed the practice of oral history
b. he tried to separate fact from legend.
c. he wrote the history of persian wars.
d. he interviewed people and looked at various sources.

The correct option is B

Herodotus of Halicarnassus was a Greek historian and geographer who lived between 484 and 425 BC. C., traditionally considered as the father of History in the western world and was the first to compose a reasoned and structured account of human actions. He devoted part of his life to travel to obtain the information and materials that allowed him to write a work of great historical and literary value. However, he received severe criticism, including from his contemporaries, for including in his work anecdotes and digressions that, although they provided valuable information, had little to do with the object of study that had been proposed: the Persian struggles against Greeks

A) He championed the practise of oral history is the correct answer.

Explanation:

Prior to Herodotus, there was no difference between history and myths and it was not easy to get accurate account of historical events. He was the first person to study history in a systematic manner. He didn't reject myths and legends but used them for the further investigation. He was most concerned with revealing facts for the reader and leaving the analysis for the leader. His book "The Histories" contained the account of Greco-Persian Wars and was published around the Year 425 BC. Observation and interviewing individuals were some of the methods which was pioneered by him.

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is

paper money known as continental currency, or continentals.