2. Corroboration: Does the evidence in Document B support or contradict the evidence in Document A? Explain your reasoning

Hello. You forgot to provide the following information:

Document A: Texas Declaration of Independence

Document B: Alamo Defenders’ Speech

Document B supports document A.

Explanation:

Alamo Defenders’ Speech was designed to reinforce the need for support in the fight for Texas independence. The speech supports the need for a free and absolute texas and therefore the execution of an armed struggle and the defense of the territory of the Alamo is extremely important, as it would be crucial for the objectives of independence to be met. The evidence used in this document supports the evidence from the Texas Independence Declaration, as it shows the reasons that led to the desire for independence and the willingness to fight for it.

explanation:

a trial judge has broad powers in his courtroom. the judge's decision is usually final for the duration of the trial, and the party's one special type of witness is an expert witness.

hi there!

question - in the 1900s there were two competing views about the environment that often pitted industrialist and conservationist against one another. how were these two competing views demonstrated by the environmental policies of president roosevelt and president taft?

hope this : )