Which of the following sentences from the second argument would the writer of the first argument agree with?
"The majesty and mystery of exotic animals from all around the world can be found in
one amazing place the zoo."
"If all wild animals flourished in their natural habitats, there would still be important
educational reasons for bringing some of them to live where they could be seen and
studied."
"Could anyone who had never seen a gorilla, giraffe, or elephant firsthand ever truly
appreciate these amazing animals?"
"Admittedly, there are some bad zoos: animals are kept in filthy and cramped
conditions, fall ill from poor nutrition, and are shown to the public merely for profit."

to protest slavery i would think it would be a

arianism, proposed by arius in the third century ce, proposed that jesus christ could not be god because god himself is unique and immutable. this would mean that jesus christ was created by god and therefore lesser. this was considered heretical and banned from orthodoxy, but caught on in germanic cultures. developed approximately around 500 bce by gautama buddha in northeastern india, buddhism first spread to central asia and southeast asia after a few centuries.   shortly thereafter it spread into china, korea, and japan. although initially rome's government persecuted early christian communities, the roman emperor constantine tolerated christians and even converted to christianity himself; christianity became the official state religion. the athenian empire and the nabataeans existed before christianity. the hunnic empire, a great enemy to rome, was never christian. the mongol empire had a christian population that was tolerated but was never officially christian.

the south did not want the federal laws to overrule the state laws.