2. "Therefore, as your President, performing my constitutional duty to "give to the Congress information of the state of the Union.” I find it, unhappily necessary to report that the future and the
safety of our country and of our democracy are overwhelming involved in events far beyond our
borders."
Based on events happening in Europe and the Pacific, how is the safety of the U. S. and of its democracy
in the events of the far beyond America's borders?

That state of the Union Address was given by Franklin D. Roosevelt at a time when the world was embroiled in the Second World War.

Explanation:

Both Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan represented a threat to American secutiry, even if not as direct as the threat they represented to other nations of Europe (in the case of Nazi Germany) or Asian nations like China (in the case of Imperial Japan).

Time would prove Roosevelt right, and the U.S. would enter the war after the attack on Pearl Harbor. The U.S. would go on to become a determinant factor in the allied victory during WWII.

cornfield (filler filler filler filler ignore this filler filler)

comparison is that they aren't nationalistic. a dif is that sds is government approved movemnet while yaf isnt \

it isnt that hard

explanation: