Imagine that you are a scientist conducting an experiment using the scientific method. During the experiment, it turns out that your results disagree with your hypothesis. What steps must you take next to successfully complete your experiment? Explain and be very specific.

The most recent incident where I have successfully encountered an ambiguous situation was happened last week. As I am working in a University as a lecturer. I had to deliver three lectures last Thursday. I reached university, parked my car in the car park. When I was about to enter in the university, three students came to me and told that there will be no class today, because vice chancellor had announced a holiday regarding cultural festival today and we all had to make some preparations. I got confused because I had to conduct an exam as well. I just started thinking about all the incident. It was very much ambiguous. Before going back to home, I called the higher authorities, my cell was jammed. It make me realize it could be student's trick. Then I called on all those students, and on inquiring deep, they all told me the real incident, and they all were very ashamed. That'a how I handled this incident effectively.

Explanation:

gaius cassius longinus and marcus junius brutus, former enemies of julius caesar who'd joined the roman senate, led caesar's assassination, dubbing themselves "the liberators." and the second one is   the assassination of julius caesar was the result of a conspiracy by many roman senators led by gaius cassius longinus, decimus junius brutus albinus, and marcus junius brutus. they stabbed caesar (23 times) to death in a location adjacent to the theatre of pompey on the ides of march 15 march 44 bc.