Whenever archaeologists excavate a site, they use primary and secondary sources to learn about that site and its artifacts. Are these research methods enough to give complete information about the discovered site or artifact? What other methods do you suggest to help uncover more information about the archaeological find? Do you think that information gained from oral history is helpful or misleading while concluding an archaeological find?
Answers: 2
Another question on History
History, 21.06.2019 19:00
The hutu militia group responsible for carrying out widespread murders in rwanda in 1994 was a. the rpf b. the habyiramana c. the interahamwe d. the nazis
Answers: 3
History, 21.06.2019 22:50
What kind of relationship did the soviet union have with the united states in 1945
Answers: 1
History, 21.06.2019 23:00
Following archduke franz ferdinand's assassination, austro-hungarian leaders: a. aided the ottoman empire in its campaign to keep serbia under its control. b. executed nearly all prominent serbs living in austria-hungary c. threatened to invade serbia if serb leaders did not agree to a set of strict demands. d.. formed an alliance with great britain to protect austria-hungary from future attacks.
Answers: 3
History, 21.06.2019 23:30
Johnny is 13. police arrested hom for spray painting on the side of am office building. because of the in re gault decision
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Whenever archaeologists excavate a site, they use primary and secondary sources to learn about that...
Questions
Mathematics, 09.12.2020 02:40
Mathematics, 09.12.2020 02:40
Health, 09.12.2020 02:40
History, 09.12.2020 02:40
Mathematics, 09.12.2020 02:40
Chemistry, 09.12.2020 02:40
History, 09.12.2020 02:40
English, 09.12.2020 02:40
Mathematics, 09.12.2020 02:40
Mathematics, 09.12.2020 02:40
Biology, 09.12.2020 02:40
