How did the supreme court rule in the miranda decision?

a.
ernesto miranda was found guilty on all counts.
b.
ernesto miranda had been denied his rights.
c.
ernesto miranda could not be tried twice for the same crime.
d.
ernesto miranda did not have the right to avoid self-incrimination.

The correct answer is B) Ernesto Miranda had been denied his rights.

Ernesto Miranda's case is famous for establishing the "Miranda Rights" we know today. Before being officially arrested, an individual is read their miranda rights. This lets the citizen know exactly what rights they possess.

The reasoning for this warning is due to Miranda's case. Miranda was charged with a crime and after two long hours of interrogation, he finally admitted to committing the crime. However, he did not know at the time that he had the right to have an attorney present. His lawyer argued that this was a violation of his rights and that his case should be thrown out. The court agreed and Miranda became a free man.

The correct answer is B) Ernesto Miranda had been denied his rights.

Ernesto Miranda's case is famous for establishing the "Miranda Rights" we know today. Before being officially arrested, an individual is read their miranda rights. This lets the citizen know exactly what rights they possess.

The reasoning for this warning is due to Miranda's case. Miranda was charged with a crime and after two long hours of interrogation, he finally admitted to committing the crime. However, he did not know at the time that he had the right to have an attorney present. His lawyer argued that this was a violation of his rights and that his case should be thrown out. The court agreed and Miranda became a free man.

B Ernesto Miranda has been denied his rights   just took the test on edg and got a 100

Explanation:

B Ernesto Miranda has been denied his rights   just took the test on edg and got a 100

Explanation:

explanation:

the muslim keep their culture pure by finding new value

i believe it was spain