One argument that the dissenting justices make is that you cannot conclude an entire group will be disloyal just because what?

One argument that dissenting judges make is that you can not conclude that an entire group will be disloyal just because one member of the group was disloyal.

Explanation:

It is an unfair judgment to generalize an entire group of disloyal when it is proved that just as some of its members acted with disloyalty.

In politics, a dissent is the act of disagreeing with an official policy, with an instituted (or constituted) power or with a collective decision. Individuals and groups that opt for dissent are called dissidents. The term is particularly applied to dissidences that take place in authoritarian and totalitarian regimes.

the answer would be option c. the chief result of u.s. participation in world war i is that, the u.s. forces ended the stalemate and led to an allied victory. after the us joined wwi, the allies had the forces they need to triumph. hope this is the answer that you are looking for.

explanation:

mark brainliest and have a great day!