Which statement best summarizes the ruling of the
Connecticut Supreme Court

So, I just took a test with this exact question. For me, the options were:

The property could not be considered for public use.

The property could be seized only if the city could prove the community would benefit.

The government had the right to seize the property for virtually any public use.

The government did not have the right to condemn the property.

Is it the same for you?

The answer to mine was:

C: The government had the right to seize the property for virtually any public use

I hope this helps!!

the constitution gives congress the power to regulate commerce "among" the several states.