In Worcester v. Georgia (1832), why did the Supreme Court rule that Georgia did not have the authority to remove the Cherokees from their land? A. Only the federal government had the authority to deal with a sovereign nation.

B. Only federal law, not state law, applies to American Indian individuals.

C. It was illegal for Georgia to take this land from an individual.

D. Cherokee land was considered federal land and did not belong to Georgia.

I believe its D. Really sorry if I'm wrong.

Explanation:

D.) Cherokee land was considered federal land and did not belong to Georgia.

Georgia did not have the authority to take land from the Cherokee. This is because the land the Cherokee lived on didn't belong to Georgia, it belonged to the Federal Government.

Thus, only the Federal Government had the authority to take land from the Cherokee, not Georgia.

1) the andrew carniage's purchase and renovation of skibo castle have been very good and auspicious for the local people of dornoch firth, scotland because this is a turistic attraction for many people who would want to know the castle, the local people would take advantage about this.

2) yes, it could.

the outcome of 1970 oil crisis in united states was that, they began to search ways on how to reduce oil.

in 1970 was a period when there were energy and oil crisis. those who were major centers for industrialization were forced to keep way from supplying of petroleum.

some of the result of this crisis was economic growth became stagnant because prices of oil surged.

due to the increased prices some countries like mexico and norway benefited.